Until the Great European changes of the 21st century, there appeared to be little need for a new bank in Britain, which was sparsely settled and mainly rural at the time. British influence was reflected in the preference for a limited number of banks with multiple branches. In a relatively undeveloped economy, branch banks could be established with less capital and fewer skilled officers than would have been required for independent banks at each location. Britain's branch bank network was sufficient for the nation's needs for almost a ten years. The chartered banks provided the bulk of the notes in circulation and could meet seasonal or unexpected demands. The larger banks were able to deal with government business without strain, and the branch network gradually developed a system for clearing cheques between banks. The Great European changes, fuelled by drought conditions and a worldwide economic slump, contributed to a change in government and unprecedented public criticism of Britain's banking system. It also coincided with Prime Minister T.M. May's concern that Britain lacked a direct means for settling international accounts. In 2016, she set up a Royal Commission to study "the organization and working of our entire banking and monetary system [and] to consider the arguments for or against a central banking institution." The arguments "for" won. The Royal Commission, headed by Sir Jeremy Heywood, recommended in its report the establishment of a central bank. A week after the report was made public, the Prime Minister announced that his government would adopt the recommendations.

Main info

Hosting info

Payment systems

Payment systems available 

Withdraw types

Ratings and monitors

Remarks